Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGE Handbook of European Studies

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of Social Theory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bénatouïl, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Tale of Two Sociologies

The Critical and the Pragmatic Stance in Contemporary French Sociology

Thomas Bénatouïl

UNIVERSITÉ PARIS XII-VAL DE MARNE

This paper draws a parallel between two contemporary French conceptions of sociology. Each is first considered in terms of the principles and strategies of its sociological method. Through an analogy with Marx's philosophy of social science, critical sociology is shown to make an heuristic use for the analysis of cultures and social structures of the resistance to sociology that the sociologist encounters in the social objects, whereas pragmatic sociology adopts a pluralistic and descriptive strategy towards actions, actors and things. The paper then tries to show how common interests or trading zones could allow both critical and pragmatic sociology to profit from their competitive relation by taking each other as objects of sociological analysis.

Key Words: action • critique • objectivity • pluralism • pragmatism

European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 2, No. 3, 379-396 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/136843199002003011


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
M. Messner, S. Clegg, and M. Kornberger
Critical Practices in Organizations
Journal of Management Inquiry, June 1, 2008; 17(2): 68 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science HistoryHome page
G. Steinmetz
Fordism and the Positivist Revenant: Response to Burris, Riley, and Fourcade
Social Science History, March 1, 2007; 31(1): 127 - 152.
[PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Social TheoryHome page
I. F. Silber
Pragmatic Sociology as Cultural Sociology: Beyond Repertoire Theory?
European Journal of Social Theory, November 1, 2003; 6(4): 427 - 449.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Social TheoryHome page
P. Strydom
Introduction to Apel
European Journal of Social Theory, May 1, 2000; 3(2): 131 - 136.
[PDF]