This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kemp, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Critical Realism and the Limits of Philosophy

University of Edinburgh, UK, s.kemp{at}ed.ac.uk

This article critiques the idea that, by establishing a general framework within which research must be conducted, philosophical argument can ‘take the lead’ in relation to research. It develops Holmwood’s work in this area by examining the ontological arguments put forward by critical realists, which attempt to establish the fundamental characteristics of the social realm prior to the production of empirically successful research in that realm. The article draws on a contrast with ontological argument in the natural sciences to demonstrate the illegitimacy of this manoeuvre, showing that ontological claims can be given some justification, but only when they are derived from research that is widely held to be empirically successful. Realist ontological claims in the social sciences do not have this basis, and it is argued that Bhaskar’s alternative mode of justification for these claims is unconvincing. Archer’s view is also criticized that critical realist arguments should be given a strong regulatory role in relation to research, illustrating the problems with this by critiquing Cruickshank’s ontologically driven analysis of unemployment and the underclass. The article concludes that social scientific research should be conducted without philosophical legislation.

Key Words: Bhaskar • critical realism • general theory • Holmwood • ontology

European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 8, No. 2, 171-191 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1368431005051762


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Reed and J. Alexander Social Science as Reading and Performance: A Cultural-Sociological Understanding of Epistemology European Journal of Social Theory, February 1, 2009; 12(1): 21 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Carolan Society, Biology, and Ecology: Bringing Nature Back Into Sociology's Disciplinary Narrative Through Critical Realism Organization Environment, December 1, 2005; 18(4): 393 - 421. [Abstract] [PDF]