Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGE Handbook of European Studies

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of Social Theory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gane, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Max Weber as Social Theorist

‘Class, Status, Party’

Nicholas Gane

Brunel University, UK, Nicholas.Gane{at}brunel.ac.uk

While Max Weber is commonly treated as a social theorist or a theorist of social stratification, relatively little attention has been paid to the theory of the social that is developed in his work. In view of this, this article turns to Weber’s most explicit theorization of the social: the section of Economy and Society entitled ‘Class, Status, Party’. In this work, Weber treats class as a non-social form, in contrast to status groups and parties, which are seen to emerge through communal or associative modes of socialization. Given this, it is argued that it is a mistake to reduce ‘Class, Status, Party’ to an argument about social stratification. Rather, this work is a general theorization of the social in relation to the spheres of economics and politics. Read in this way, Weber’s work is presented as a possible resource for rejuvenating social theory that goes beyond study of class or ‘societal’ structures, and which privileges analysis of social relationships (including those that go beyond nation-state boundaries) in the competition for social and political power.

Key Words: class • party • power • social relationships • status • stratification

European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 8, No. 2, 211-226 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1368431005051764


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Classical SociologyHome page
D. Inglis and R. Robertson
The Elementary Forms of Globality: Durkheim and the Emergence and Nature of Global Life
Journal of Classical Sociology, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 5 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
S. Bach, I. Kessler, and P. Heron
The consequences of assistant roles in the public services: Degradation or empowerment?
Human Relations, September 1, 2007; 60(9): 1267 - 1292.
[Abstract] [PDF]