This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Inglis, D. Articles by Robertson, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Ecumenical Analytic

‘Globalization’, Reflexivity and the Revolution in Greek Historiography

University of Aberdeen, UK, d.inglis{at}abdn.ac.uk

Roland Robertson

University of Aberdeen, UK, soc123{at}abdn.ac.uk

‘Globalization’ has become in recent years one of the central themes of social scientific debates. Social theories of globalization may be regarded as specific academic and analytic manifestations of wider forms of ‘global consciousness’ to be found in the social world today. These are ways of thinking and perceiving which emphasize that the whole world should be seen as ‘one place’, its various geographically disparate parts all being interconnected in various complex ways. In this article we set out how both a general ‘ecumenical sensibility’ involving such ways of thinking, and its specifically academic variant, an ‘ecumenical analytic’, are simultaneously responses to ‘globalizing conditions’ and also products of the latter. We demonstrate how social theories of globalization, locatable in the overall set we call the ‘ecumenical analytic’, are reflexive thought-products, in that they both seek to investigate, and are made possible by, ‘globalizing conditions’. Rejecting the view that both an ecumenical sensibility and an ecumenical analytic are solely products of modernity, we show how such modes of consciousness and analysis were present in the period of Greek history between the death of Alexander the Great and the rise of the Roman Empire. We show how at that period a socio-political situation akin in certain ways to modern ‘globalizing conditions’ generated both an ecumenical sensibility and an ecumenical analytic, the latter most forcefully represented by a revolutionary new genre in historiography called Universal History. By examining the ideas of its most famous practitioner, the historian Polybius, we demonstrate that Universal History both provided a framework for understanding what we today would call ‘globalization’, and exhibited a remarkable degree of reflexive awareness about its own conditions of possibility. We seek to show that an attentiveness to ‘global’ processes and a reflexive understanding of what makes that form of thinking possible in the first place, are not solely confined to modernity but were identifiable features of intellectual production in the Hellenistic period of ancient Greece. In this way we argue that scholars today should not imagine that the contemporary ‘global turn’ in social thought is either unique or wholly historically unprecedented.

Key Words: cosmopolitanism • Ecumene • ecumenical • globalization • Hellenistic age • Polybius • Universal History

European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 8, No. 2, 99-122 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1368431005051759


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Inglis and R. Robertson The Elementary Forms of Globality: Durkheim and the Emergence and Nature of Global Life Journal of Classical Sociology, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 5 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Inglis and R. Robertson From republican virtue to global imaginary: changing visions of the historian Polybius History of the Human Sciences, February 1, 2006; 19(1): 1 - 18. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. McMylor Reflexive historical sociology: consciousness, experience and the author History of the Human Sciences, November 1, 2005; 18(4): 141 - 160. [Abstract] [PDF]