This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Zimmermann, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Pragmatism and the Capability Approach

Challenges in Social Theory and Empirical Research

Ehess, Paris

This article asks about the conditions of a sociological operationalization of the capability approach developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. Raising the question of freedom and social opportunities, the capability approach has so far mainly been discussed by economists and philosophers. In order to adopt this approach for a sociological and pragmatist perspective, it engages with methodological and theoretical issues. Whereas capabilities have until now mainly been studied within quantitative frameworks, the author opts for a qualitative method of inquiry that draws on a pragmatist and configurational approach. Such a shift towards qualitative inquiry is a key condition for a better sociological understanding of notions like freedom and opportunities that stand at the core of the capability approach.

Key Words: capability • freedom • pragmatism • responsibility • Sen

European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 9, No. 4, 467-484 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1368431006073014


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Carpenter The capabilities approach and critical social policy: Lessons from the majority world? Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2009; 29(3): 351 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF]